Welcome to the Finger Lakes! Our theme song:

In a town this size, there's no place to hide
Everywhere you go, you meet someone you know...
In a smokey bar, in the backseat of your car
In your own little house, someone's sure to find you out
What you do and what you think
What you eat and what you drink...

(Kieran Kane)

Monday, June 27, 2011


With New York going broke, CNY's robot army of fracking opponents have painted themselves into a corner.  Against a background of 50 years of industrial decline, they're desperately trying to convince us that there's no financial benefit to be had from all the jobs that shale gas extraction is creating in the Marcellus. 

At One of Nine, financial expert and former NY Assembly candidate Tom Reynolds takes on the "no economic benefit from fracking" story line.
Getting the straight, untwisted facts concerning any aspect of fracking is very difficult.  However, the anti-fracking element seems particularly adept at emotional (rather than factual) presentations that are half-truths.  Since my background is finance, I was particularly interested in Jannette Barth’s study on the economic impact of gas drilling in the Marcellus Shale.  Both in her study and at anti-fracking meetings Barth states, “Studies used to support the claim that drilling will bring economic benefits to New York are either biased, dated, (or) seriously flawed.”
Then, she produces a study that is “biased, dated, and seriously flawed.”


  1. At last, someone who has it right. Reynolds has put his finger on the "tell 'em anything but stop the development" crowd.

  2. Shale gas development is simply not economic for most of New York State